Legal Opinion
State v. Cisneros
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 13, 1992No. 26111-8-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Arthur A. Cisneros appeals his convictions for delivery and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, alleging the trial court erred in (1) refusing to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to an electronic intercept order; and (2) refusing to order an evidentiary hearing to determine whether there were material omissions from the intercept application. We affirm.
Facts
On January 21, 1988, a controlled purchase of cocaine was arranged by telephone between Cisneros and an informant. Detective David Bales of the Snohomish County Sheriffs office was present with the informant during the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- People v. LeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. D.J.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.