Moynahan v. Hanaford
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Defendant Hanaford brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Moynahan brought suit in the Superior Court of Detroit to recover the amount of four promissory notes, all in the same form. The following is a copy of one:
“ $100. Detroit, May 1, 1877.
Three months after date I promise to pay to the order of M. J. Moynahan one hundred dollars at People’s Savings Bank with ten per cent interest.
[Signed] Charles Locke.
[Across the back] Tristram & Webber.”
According to the settled doctrine of this court the note, being made payable to the order of another than those writing their names upon the back, the latter must be regarded as joint makers with Locke.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Rothschild v. GrixMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peninsular Savings Bank v. HosieMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- North Star Boot & Shoe Co. v. StebbinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- J. A. Fay & Co. v. James Jenks & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Clarke v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891