Tyndale v. Old Colony Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
These are two actions of tort, both under the St. of 1887, c. 270. The first is brought by the administrator of the estate of Michael Dolan, and seeks to recover for the conscious suffering of the intestate, in consequence of his being struck by a locomotive engine of the defendant, through the negligence of the persons in charge thereof, and in consequence of the negligence of officers or agents having charge of the despatching of trains, the movement of cars, velocipedes, and other rolling stock. The second action is brought under § 2 of the above named act, by the next of kin of said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Corcoran v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Hinckley v. Cape Cod RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Shea v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Riley v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Manning v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Donaldson v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Maher v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.