Legal Opinion

Illick v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are Btated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate was a brakeman ■on the defendant’s cars, and, as plaintiff claims, was killed through the negligence of the company in constructing and maintaining an improper and dangerous railroad bridge on the line of its road near Chippewa station, in the county of Osceola.

It is for the killing of young Illick, by reason of such negligence on the part of the defendant, that this suit is brought, and sought to be maintained.

The only wrong counted upon in the plaintiff’s declaration is that the defendant was negligent in maintaining an improperly constructed bridge. The only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Wonder v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  4. Ladd v. New Bedford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw Railroad v. GildersleeveMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Choctaw, O. & G. R. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Ragon v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Manning v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Clay v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API