Golen v. Union Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This appeal presents the question of whether private nuisance provides a remedy for a landowner who cannot sell his or her property because of neighboring environmental contamination, when the contamination does not otherwise affect the landowner’s use of the property. The trial court granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment, finding that private nuisance does not provide a remedy. We affirm.
Both appellants’ and appellees’ property are located in an industrial section of Philadelphia. During the 1970’s, appellees’ property was used for recycling electrical transformers,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Firth v. ScherzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Karpiak v. RussoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Kembel v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Kansas Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Diess v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Reynolds v. RUCK'S MUSHROOM SERVICE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Two Rivers Terminal, L.P. v. Chevron USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Dumm v. DahlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.