Legal Opinion

Karpiak v. Russo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1996PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge.

Appellants, Paul and Connie Karpiak, Francis and Judith Bodnar, Andrew and Lucille Tomko, and James and Barbara Werley, appeal the September 12,1995 order wherein the trial court refused to lift a compulsory nonsuit entered at trial. This action involves allegations of nuisance, trespass, violation of the zoning laws and was instituted against appellees, J.S. and Patricia Russo, Plum Boro Supply Company J.S. Russo Construction Company, and The Dixie Corporation, as the result of their operation of a landscaping supply business on Saltsburg Road in Plum Borough. We affirm.

This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Waschak v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Kembel v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Anderson v. Guerrein Sky-Way Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  2. Diess v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Kriss v. Fayette CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania American Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Mercer v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API