Hales v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
' Civil ACTION from Edgecombe, beard on return to preliminary rej straining order and on motion to make the same permanent, before Connor, J., at Wilson, N. C., on 7 July, 1916. • There was judgment dissolving the restraining order, and plaintiffs^ having duly excepted, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHoKe, J.
On the hearing it was properly made to appear that on 8 June, 1915, defendants Eose and Eicks bought and plaintiff sold and conveyed to said defendants a certain right of way over a lot of plaintiff’s in the city of Eocky Mount, the agreement between them being embodied in a written contract, signed by all the parties, in terms as follows:
“This contract, made this 8th day of June, 1915, by and between D. J. Eose and E. IT. Eicks of the one part and Gr. J. Hales of the other part:
“Witnesseth, That for and in consideration of the sum of five hundred dollars ($500) paid by said Eose and Eicks to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Greene v. CannyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Dudgeon v. BronsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Shaver v. EdgellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- Griffin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Buckler v. Davis Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- State, by Peeples, Atty. Gen. v. GibbesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Hundley v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Beins v. OdenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.