Legal Opinion
Scott v. Crescent Tool Co., Div. of Crescent Niagara Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided January 15, 1969No. Civ. A. 11974PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDENFIELD, District Judge.
The court is presented with a motion by the defendant, Crescent Tool Company, an out-of-state corporation, to quash service of process against it. 1
Plaintiff, an employee of Fruehauf Trailers of Atlanta, states that he used Crescent’s metal punch on October 17, 1967, to remove a pin from a trailer brake shoe. Plaintiff contends that the punch was new and that he was using it for the purpose for which it was made. Plaintiff gave the large end of the punch several blows with a hammer, when the small end of the punch shattered and a piece allegedly hit plaintiff’s left…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hayes v. IrwinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- Thorington v. CashCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Grey v. Continental Marketing Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
- Vernon Eugene Bracewell v. Nicholson Air Services, Inc., a Maryland Corporation D/B/A Cumberland Air Lines and Cumberland Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Mark Trucks, Inc. v. Arrow Aluminum Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.