Legal Opinion

State v. Kirby

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 13, 1968No. 6826SC409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to grant his motion for nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

Before resting its case, the State introduced two witnesses. Phil George Lucas gave testimony to the effect that he was the owner of the premises, that they were burglarized on the night of 23 February 1968 or early morning of 24 February 1968, and that the property itemized in the bill of indictment was taken.

The other witness was Ted Cook, a 15-year-old cousin of the defendant, whose testimony is summarized as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. TaftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LognerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API