Legal Opinion
State v. Hooker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 13, 1956No. 724PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
In apt time defendant, appellant, in writing requested the trial court to give these special instructions:
“1. In North Carolina, a defendant may be convicted upon the unsupported testimony of an accomplice, if the jury is satisfied from such testimony and beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt; and, in this case, the witnesses Purcell and Williams are which is known in law as accomplices; and their testimony as to the guilt of the defendant is unsupported by any other evidence.
“2. However, the court further instructs you that it is dangerous to convict a defendant upon the unsupported…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. . BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.