State v. Hessler
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 670 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS and Neomi did not file an answer until March 29, 2013, with an amended answer filed April 5. While Correa sees this action as deceitful, on these facts we cannot agree. There is no evi- dence that the estate, Neomi, or State Farm acted to prevent Correa from correcting the defect in service by reopening the estate and having a special administrator appointed. Correa’s fourth and final assignment of error is without merit. CONCLUSION Because the special administrator was not served within 6 months of the commencement of the action, the district…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.