Legal Opinion
Williams v. Dodson
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided July 16, 1998No. 03-97-00705-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAKEL, Chief Justice.
Appellee Troy Dodson (“Dodson”) sued appellant Richard Williams d/b/a Rich’s Fine Jewelry (“Williams”) for conversion and violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.01-.854 (West 1987 & Supp.1998) (“DTPA”). The trial court ruled in Dodson’s favor and awarded damages of $12,516.30. Williams appeals by three points of error, arguing that: (1) the trial court applied the wrong measure of damages, (2) Dodson did not produce legally or factually sufficient evidence of the actual damages awarded by the trial court, and (3) Dodson was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International-Great Northern R. v. CaseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Crisp v. Security National Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One v. Haupt, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ChanceTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- American National Insurance Co. v. Paul, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alan Reuber Chevrolet, Inc. v. Grady Chevrolet, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- In the Interest of S.R.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004