Legal Opinion

Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One v. Haupt, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1993No. D-2803PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENOCH, Justice.

The question in this oil and gas case is whether the “accommodation” doctrine, first articulated by this court in Getty Oil Co. v. Jones, 470 S.W.2d 618 (Tex.1971), should be applied in determining whether inverse condemnation of a mineral estate has occurred when a governmental entity that owns the surface estate restricts the use of the surface by the mineral owner and lessee. We hold that the accommodation doctrine applies and must be considered before a court may determine that an inverse condemnation of the mineral estate has occurred.

The trial court held that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Waco v. Texland CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Abilene v. Burk Royalty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lewis v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Maguire Oil Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. Lesley v. VETERANS LAND BD. OF STATETexas Supreme Court · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API