In the Interest of S.R.O.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
Priscilla Garza and Gary Olson filed competing motions to modify the custody provisions of their divorce decree and com*239peting motions to enforce various provisions of the decree. The court granted Garza’s motion to modify in part, wholly denied Olson’s motion to modify, and granted each party’s motion to enforce in part. Olson presents four issues in which he contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to make and file findings of fact and conclusions of law; (2) granting Garza’s motion to modify; (3) failing to render judgment in his favor for fifty…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Cherne Industries, Inc. v. MagallanesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Mumma v. AguirreTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Tenery v. TeneryTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Goldsmith v. SalkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matis v. Golden, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- Eric Salas v. Chris Christensen Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
- John C. Golfis and Julie Nguyen v. Edward "Lanny" Houllion, Individually and as General Partner of Houllion Family, LP and Houllion Family, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
- Matis v. Golden, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- Office of the Attorney General v. Robert Sean McBee, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.