Legal Opinion

United States v. Ray Aguillard

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 12, 2012No. 11-30488UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Ray A. Aguillard appeals his conviction and 240-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to mail fraud. He argues on appeal that his sentence is both procedurally and substantively unreasonable, and that the government breached the terms of the plea agreement.

First, Aguillard argues that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court did not provide adequate reasons to justify the imposition of the maximum statutory sentence of 240 months or to make such an extensive upward variance from the guidelines range of 63 to 78 months. Because he failed to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HudgensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. Platform Architecture & Design, PLLC v. EscobarDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
  3. United States v. HudgensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API