Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Massey

Akron Municipal Court

Decided April 25, 1978No. Nos. 78 CRB 00847, 78 CRB 00948 and 78 CRB 01365PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

There is presently before the court a motion to dismiss two arrests brought pursuant to Section 648.01 of the Alerón City Code 1970, as amended, on the basis that said ordinance is unconstitutional. The ordinance reads as follows:

“648.10 Loitering
“A. It shall be unlawful to do any of the following:
“1. Loiter or remain in a publie place for the purpose of engaging, or soliciting another person to engage in sexual activity for hire. The circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such purpose is manifested are: That such person is a known prostitute or panderer, repeatedly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Johnson v. CarsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1983
  4. Christian v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Short v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API