Hoerger v. Board of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mangano, J. P.
The primary question to be resolved on the instant appeal is whether the plaintiffs' first cause of action insofar as it is asserted against the defendant union is governed, as argued by the union, by either a four-month or six-month Statute of Limitations, or by this State's six-year Statute of Limitations for contract actions.
Contrary to the union's argument, we hold that the plaintiff's first cause of action against the union is governed by this State's six-year Statute of Limitations for contract actions, as provided in CPLR 213 (2), and was, therefore,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McDermott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Civil Service Bar Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rosen v. SpaniermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Rigby v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990
- Hoerger v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Allied International Bancorp, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.