Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Spanierman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1989No. 87 Civ. 9045(PKL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
LEISURE, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Hobart E. Rosen, Norma Ro-sen (collectively “the Rosens”) and Frances Lipman (“Lipman”) brought this action against defendants Ira Spanierman and the Ira Spanierman Gallery (collectively “Spa-nierman”), 1 asserting claims for breach of warranty, common law fraud, professional negligence, and negligent misrepresentation. Defendant moved for summary judg ment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), contending that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitation and do not constitute claims upon which relief can be granted. The…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hobart E. Rosen, Norma Rosen, and Frances Lipman v. Ira Spanierman and Ira Spanierman GalleryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Congress Financial Corp. v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Foxley v. Sotheby's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Momentive Performance Materials USA, Inc. v. Astrocosmos Metallurgical, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2009