Legal Opinion

Frosh v. Sun Drug Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 17, 1932No. 12,680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties are hereinafter referred to as Frosh and the company respectively.

The company brought this action to enjoin Frosh from prosecuting suits against it for rent in justice court, to declare a lease dissolved, and for damages for ouster, injury to merchandise and fixtures, expense of moving, and loss of profits, all in the aggregate sum of $7,000. The answer admitted the commencement of an action in justice court for $205 rent, denied ouster and damages, charged voluntary abandonment of the premises and violation of the terms of the lease, and counterclaimed for $400 unpaid rent.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creek v. Lebo Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Lathrop v. MadduxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Greenstein v. ConradiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Fountain Valley Land & Irrigation Co. v. WagonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thirteenth & Washington Sts. Corp. v. NeslenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Stevens v. Vail Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Ackerhalt v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Farr v. Wasatch Chemical Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. J. C. Penney Co. v. BirrellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API