Legal Opinion

Lathrop v. Maddux

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1914No. 7827PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Montrose District Court.—Hon. Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The complaint in brief, alleges, that on the 28th day of August, *2591909, the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant for the purchase of a twenty horse power International Harvester gasoline traction engine. That the agreed price was $1,680.00, to be delivered in the city of Montrose, of which $500.00 was to be paid upon delivery, and the remainder by two promissory notes due January 1, 1910, and December 1, 1910, respectively, to be secured by chattel mortgage.

It is alleged that the defendant represented to the plaintiff that the engine so agreed to be purchased, was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. McClellan v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  3. American Bonding & Trust Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Stimson v. HelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. Smith v. Columbus Buggy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  2. Ralston Oil and Gas Co. v. July Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Irrigation Motor and Pump Co. v. BelcherColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Eggen v. M. and K. Trailers & Mobile Home Brok., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Frosh v. Sun Drug Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API