Legal Opinion

Fraser v. California Street Cable Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1905No. S.F. No. 3391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Action for injury to the person of plaintiff through the negligence of defendant while the former was a passenger on a street-ear of the latter. The defendant had a verdict and judgment in its favor, and the plaintiff appeals from an order denying him a new trial.

Appellant’s first and principal contention is, that the verdict is contrary to evidence because the evidence shows that the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury. Without substantial conflict, the evidence shows that the plaintiff as a passenger boarded defendant’s car going west on California…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lee v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Le Grand v. U-Drive-It Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Lupton v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Graham v. Coos Bay R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lupton v. . Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Schlaifer v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API