Legal Opinion
Robert P. Kropp v. Sylvester A. Ziebarth, A/K/A Silver A. Ziebarth, and Carol A. Ziebarth, Husband and Wife, and Cleon Striegel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1979No. 78-1182PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING, WITHDRAWING PRIOR OPINION, AND SUBSTITUTING OPINION OF THE COURT.
Robert P. Kropp, in seeking a rehearing, contends essentially that the district court erred in admitting into evidence exhibits 51 and 92 of the Buyers (Sylvester Ziebarth, Carol Ziebarth, and Cleon Striegel), because the exhibits lack foundation and impermis-sibly reflect gross rather than net losses in value to Buyers stemming from Kropp’s breach of contract. The exhibits in question illustrate the losses allegedly suffered by Buyers on the sale of the herd of exotic cattle bought from…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert P. Kropp v. Sylvester A. Ziebarth, A/K/A Silver A. Ziebarth and Carl A. Ziebarth, Husband and Wife, and Cleon StriegelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A. v. Texas Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Lovely v. Burroughs CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1974
- Srybnik v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Roberts v. City of TroyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Estate of Hevia v. Portrio Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Superturf, Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Stanley Greenwood v. Thomas H. Dittmer, Ray E. Friedman & Company, Stanley Greenwood v. Thomas H. Dittmer, Ray E. Friedman & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.