In the Interest of I. G.

Smith, Presiding Judge.

The mother of two-year-old I. G. appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights.1 She contends that clear and convincing evidence did not support the juvenile court’s finding that her parental rights to the child had been lost. We disagree and affirm.

“On appeal from a termination order, this Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee and determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the biological parent’s rights to custody have been lost.” (Citation, punctuation and…