In the Interest of H. M.

Ruffin, Judge.

The natural mother of H. M. appeals the juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to her daughter, who was then two years old.1 On appeal, the mother challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting termination and asserts that the juvenile court’s ruling violates her constitutional rights. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. In reviewing an order terminating parental rights, we construe the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the juvenile court’s findings and judgment.2 We do not weigh the evidence or evaluate witness credibility, but “determine…