Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C. G.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 29, 2008No. A07A1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

The parents of four children appeal the termination of their parental rights. They contend the evidence was insufficient to support the decision. On appeal from a termination order, this Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee and determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s rights to custody have been lost. In the Interest of S. H., 251 Ga. App. 555 (1) (553 SE2d 849) (2001). “We do not weigh the evidence and must defer to the trial judge as the factfinder.” (Citation and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clark v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. In the Interest of M. L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. In the Interest of S. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Chapin v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. In the Interest of J. K.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of T. B. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. In the Interest of J. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. In the Interest of E. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. In the Interest of G. Q.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. In Re CgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API