Inland Nursery & Floral Co. v. Rice
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J.,' entered July 15, 1909, dismissing an action to cancel corporate stock, upon sustaining objections to the admission of evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The purpose of this action was to cancel the stock of appellant, now held by respondents, upon the ground that the same was fraudulently issued. The issues being framed, the court below, at the time of the hearing, sustained respondents’ objection to the introduction of evidence, upon the ground that the amended complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and this appeal was taken from the judgment of dismissal.
The allegations of the amended complaint reviewed by the ruling of the court are, that H. G. Rice and J. H. Mumm were formerly engaged in the nursery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wells v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Turner v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Kroenert v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hoffman Motor Truck Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Eggleston v. PantagesWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Roberson v. DraneyUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Davis v. HarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Gold Ridge Mining & Development Co. v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.