Legal Opinion
American Sheet & Tin Plate Co. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1936No. Nos. 3110-3113, 3130, 3136PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
The six above-entitled cases involving similar issues were brought under the Act of Congress of October 22, 1913, 38 Stat. at Large 219, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 41 (28), 45, 46, 47 (amending Act June 18, 1910, 36 Stat. 519), to enjoin orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring railroad companies to discontinue payments of allowances to plaintiffs for the performance of certain terminal service commonly called “spotting.”
These cases were heard before J. WARREN DAVIS, Circuit Judge; R. M. GIBSON and F. P. SCPIOONMAKER, District Judges.
By agreement of counsel in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1937
- Kurn v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1942
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. David J. Joseph Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944