Legal Opinion

Sieman v. Postorino Sandblasting & Painting Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1981No. Docket 50245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, P.J.

Postorino Sandblasting and Painting Company appeals by leave granted from an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) requiring Postorino to pay compensation to Dale F. Sieman and to reimburse Liberty Mutual Insurance Company for any compensation it previqusly paid to plaintiff. A cross-appeal has been fiied by Sieman.

Postorino is a Wisconsin corporation based in Marinette, Wisconsin. It does between 75% and 85% of its business in Wisconsin and most of the remainder in Michigan. Postorino first obtained workers’ compensation insurance from Liberty Mutual in 1973…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kacur v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Weinberg v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Jones v. St. Joseph Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Consolidated Underwriters v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Pre-Fab Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fuller v. Director of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Smith & Chambers Salvage v. Insurance Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1992
  4. Lenny Szarek, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Fuller v. Director of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API