Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This is a suit on a workmen’s compensation policy of the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund. In our opinion the learned court below misconceived the nature and extent of the obligation assumed by the Fund under that policy, and, as a result, erroneously sustained preliminary objections to plaintiffs’ complaint and entered judgment for defendant.

The State Workmen’s Insurance Fund was created by the Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 762. By section 3 of that Act it was provided that certain sums to be paid by employers should constitute a Fund for the purpose of insuring…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gotkin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Zeitz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Simmons v. JeffordsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Kacur v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Thomas v. Transport Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API