Legal Opinion · Dissent

Service Employees International Union v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1990No. B040811Published

1Dissent

JOHNSON, J., Dissenting.

In my opinion In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) providers are Los Angeles County employees for purposes of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA). My review of this appeal differs from the majority because I am convinced we should: (1) analyze this issue as a question of law; (2) exercise our own independent judgment to make our own factual determinations; and (3) decide the issue in light of the purposes of the MMBA. Furthermore, even if we analyze the issue using the common law indicia for determining whether an employer/employee relationship exists, I find the county…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bonnette v. California Health And Welfare AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. E. C. Atkins & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API