Service Employees International Union v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
JOHNSON, J., Dissenting.
In my opinion In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) providers are Los Angeles County employees for purposes of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA). My review of this appeal differs from the majority because I am convinced we should: (1) analyze this issue as a question of law; (2) exercise our own independent judgment to make our own factual determinations; and (3) decide the issue in light of the purposes of the MMBA. Furthermore, even if we analyze the issue using the common law indicia for determining whether an employer/employee relationship exists, I find the county…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bonnette v. California Health And Welfare AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. E. C. Atkins & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.