Legal Opinion

Alabama By-Products Co. v. Landgraff

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1946No. 6 Div. 230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

A certiorari in a workmen’s compensation case brings this appeal here for review.

The Reporter will set out the findings and decree of the trial court.

Counsel agreed on certain essential facts, and by these stipulations the controverted issues have been considerably narrowed.

With the innovation of the Workmen’s Compensation Act into our jurisprudence came new remedies and changed procedures. The act is sui generis and superseded and replaced many previously existing theories of personal injury damages arising out of common law and statutory actions. The terms and provisions of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garvin v. ShewbartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Hester v. RidingsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Ex Parte RuggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Masterbrand Cabinets, Inc. v. RuggsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Thomas J. Crider v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API