Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ruggs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 22, 2008No. 1061379PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nacola Ruggs petitioned this Court for the writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals reversing the decision of the trial court, which had found MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc., f/k/a NHB Industries, Inc. ("MasterBrand"), liable, pursuant to § 25-5-8(e), Ala. Code 1975, for two times the amount of compensation that would otherwise have been payable. We granted certiorari review to determine the question of first impression: Whether the double-compensation penalty provided in § 25-5-8(e), Ala. Code 1975, is subject to the time limitations set forth in Rule 59, Ala. R.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte Beaver Valley Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Ward & Gow v. KrinskySupreme Court of the United States · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Revis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Alabama Department of Revenue v. National Peanut Festival Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Masterbrand Cabinets, Inc. v. RuggsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Beasley v. PooleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Saad's Healthcare Services, Inc. v. MeinhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API