Legal Opinion

21st Century Insurance v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 2015No. E062244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

In this matter we find that plaintiff’s efforts to pursue essentially a “bad faith” action as assignee of the insured must fail. Accordingly, petitioner, the insurer in question, is entitled to the summary judgment sought below.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The underlying litigation is one for personal injury and wrongful death. Defendant Cy Tapia, a teenager living with his aunt and grandmother, was driving a vehicle that crashed, inflicting severe and eventually fatal injuries on his passenger, Cory Driscoll.

Before his death, Driscoll and his mother filed an action for damages on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Mcmillin Homes Constr., Inc. v. Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. McMillin Homes Construction v. Natl. Fire & Marine Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API