Legal Opinion
Bouchillon v. De Bautte
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 1969No. 2883PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOMENGEAUX, Judge.
We first considered the present motion to remand for a new trial in the reported case of Grosch v. De Bautte, 203 So.2d 906, wherein we did not deem it appropriate to remand for a trial de novo at that time, but rather we held said motion in abeyance pending our remand to the lower court for the limited purpose of receiving evidence to ascertain what probability there was of obtaining the missing transcript of the testimony taken at the trial, and the cause of the tardy filing of the record of appeal, and all circumstances attendant thereto, all of which is set out in our…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bouchillon v. De BautteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bouchillon v. DeBautteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neal v. NealLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Middleton v. PleasantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- W. B. McCartney Oil Co. v. RenfrowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pinnacle Polymers, LLC Versus St. John the Baptist Parish Sales and Use Tax OfficeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019