Legal Opinion

Neal v. Neal

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1972No. 4115PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO REMAND

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

Shirley Ruth Neal, defendant-appellant, filed a motion to remand this suit to the district court for the purpose of retaking certain testimony. The motion is unopposed.

The record of this case has not as yet been lodged with this court. The defendant-appellant in her motion to remand alleges that at the trial of this case unbeknown to all counsel and to the court reporter, the recording device was not properly functioning, with the result that certain indispensable testimony is unavailable for transcription in the record on this appeal. Defendant-appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bouchillon v. De BautteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kay v. Home Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Middleton v. PleasantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Loewer v. VanderhiderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Shively v. PickensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. W. B. McCartney Oil Co. v. RenfrowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API