Legal Opinion

W. B. McCartney Oil Co. v. Renfrow

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1973No. 4437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO REMAND

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiff appellant W. B. McCartney Oil Company, Inc. filed a motion to remand this suit to the District Court to retake certain testimony. The motion is unopposed. We remand.

McCartney alleges in its Motion to Remand that, at trial of this case, unbeknown to counsel and to the court reporter, the recording device was not properly functioning. Certain indispensable testimony is unavailable for transcription. McCartney attaches to its motion the sworn affidavit of the court reporter reciting that because of a mechanical malfunction in the recording device, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neal v. NealLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Bouchillon v. De BautteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Middleton v. PleasantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Miles v. PetersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API