Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Union Planters Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 2004No. 03-1363PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

Appellant David Cockrell appeals from an order, which dismissed his petition to set aside a statutory foreclosure sale of property. Cockrell contends on appeal that the circuit court erred in interpreting and construing Ark. Code Ann. §§ 18-50-116(c) and (d)(2) (Repl. 2003), when it ruled that claims and defenses under the statutory foreclosure act must be raised prior to the statutory foreclosure sale or be forever barred. He specifically contends that the statutory foreclosure act cannot be applied to a deed of trust or mortgage, which encumbers property primarily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davenport v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Barclay v. First Paris Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. Healthport, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. 3 Rivers Logistics, Inc. v. Brown-Wright Post No. 158 of the Am. LegionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Chandler v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Nolan v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Arkansas Hearing Instrument Dispenser Board v. VanceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API