Legal Opinion

Arkansas Hearing Instrument Dispenser Board v. Vance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 2004No. 03-1365PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellant, Arkansas Hearing Instrument Dispenser Board (“Board”), appeals from a circuit court order reversing the findings of the Board and concluding that there was not substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings of violations of two standards of conduct and that the disciplinary procedures violated the rights of appellee, O. G. Vance, to due process. We affirm the Board.

We review the Board’s decision and not the decision of the circuit court. Ford Motor Co. v. Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commissions, 357 Ark. 125, 161 S.W.3d 788 (2004). We look to see if there is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Middleton v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Correction v. BaileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Racine v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Arkansas Times LP v. Mark WaldripCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  4. Arkansas Times LP v. Mark WaldripCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Arkansas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API