Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Little

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 14, 2004No. 03-1115PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty C. Dickey, Chief Justice.

This case involves whether seed samples are public records under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (hereinafter “FOIA”). The Pulaski County Circuit Court, Honorable Jay Moody presiding, found that the actual physical seeds that were the subject of the FOIA request did not fall under the terms and definition of “public records,” as defined by Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-103 (5)(A) (Supp. 2003). We affirm.

On July 15, 2003, C.D. “Duff’ Nolan filed a complaint against Darryl Little, Director of the Arkansas State Plant Board, alleging Little failed to comply with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Barclay v. First Paris Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration v. Pharmacy Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Cockrell v. Union Planters BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nabholz Construction Corp. v. Contractors for Public Protection Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Ryan & Co. AR, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Valley v. Pulaski County Circuit Court, Third DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. 735 IN US CURRENCY v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API