Persse v. Gaffney
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.
There is no matter of law involved herein. The whole controversy is over the evidence, and the contention is as to the legitimate and necessary conclusions to be drawn from it. Two well settled propositions serve to dispose of the case— *375the first requires no statement of facts. The record discloses neither objection nor exception to the judgment. The decisions are numerous to the point that an exception to the judgment is a condition precedent to a review of the evidence. Burnell et al. v. Wachtel, 4 Colo. App. 556; Rocky Mountain Nat. Bank v. McCaskill, 16 Colo. 408; Hockmark v. Richler, 16…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burnell v. WachtelColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hochmark v. RichlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Rocky Mountain Nat. Bank v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fanny Rawlings Mining Co. v. TribeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Deaner v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Persse v. GaffneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Burnett v. DoyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905