Legal Opinion

National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1934No. Civ. No. 9605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

On August 1, 1933, the respondent employee received in the course of employment an injury diagnosed and found by respondent commission as a direct inguinal hernia, consisting of an aggravation of a pre-existing disease into a disabling condition, for whieh he was awarded surgical, medical and hospital treatment. Petitioner seeks annulment of such award, contending that the commission acted in excess of its authority in that the award was unreasonable, since there had been an award in 1929 for the same condition between the same parties.

It is insisted that the applicant did not sustain in 1933…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knock v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Newton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Bige v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pendell v. Westland Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API