Newton v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WASTE, C. J.,
On further consideration, we are of the view that, notwithstanding the rather persuasive-arguments of the petitioner, the decision of the district court of appeal, affirming the action of the respondent Commission denying an award, should stand. Although we might disagree with the Commission as to the weight of the evidence before it, as an appellate tribunal we may not overturn a finding of fact it has made if there is some evidence to support it. The opinion of Mr. Justice Plummer, concurred in by Mr. Justice Hart and Mr. Presiding Justice Finch, is adopted as the opinion of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
- William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Dearborn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Elk Grove Union High School District v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Pac. Emp. Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.