Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1939No. S. F. No. 16007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

With the exception that with respect to one order that is involved herein, the subject of rates proposed to be charged for transportation of freight relates particularly to canned goods, and in a second order, that soap and other allied products represent the commodities that are affected by the several proposed rates,—no important factual differences are discernible when compared with the underlying facts that are narrated in the proceeding entitled Southern Pac. Co. v. Railroad Com., No. 15980 (ante, p. 89 [87 Pac. (2d) 1055]), wherein a decision by this court has this day been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. American Toll Bridge Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Market Street Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Schaub's Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Simmons Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission & TringaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Ventura County Waterworks District No. 5 v. Public Utilies CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API