Legal Opinion

Stone v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 7921SC478PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

We hold the order of Judge Walker must be sustained. While it is true that the conduct of a lawsuit is not a game between counsel, process must be sufficient in order to give the court jurisdiction over the parties. Defendants made their motions for dismissal well within the time in which alias and pluries summons could be issued. No additional summons was issued.

Rule 4(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure requires that summons “shall be directed to the defendant or defendants and shall notify each defendant to appear and answer within 30 days after its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Neal-Millard Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Philpott v. KernsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Kleinfeldt v. Shoney's of Charlotte, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roshelli v. SperryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In re A.B.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Childress v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wetchin v. Ocean Side Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Tinkham v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API