Legal Opinion

Philpott v. Kerns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1974No. 42PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

The Court of Appeals correctly held that the court acquired no jurisdiction over defendants by the service of the summons issued in this case upon the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles. Under G.S. 1-105 (1973 Supp.) in any action for damages against a nonresident which grows out of his operation of a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this State summons may be served upon the nonresident by leaving a copy thereof with the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles and transmitting a copy to the defendant by registered mail. The required contents of a summons are set out in G.S. 1A-1,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. CAROLINA PLYWOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. McAndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Roshelli v. SperryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Shelton v. FairleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hoyle v. United Auto Workers Local Union 5285District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API