Brayman Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Before this Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Brayman Construction Corporation and Stephen M. Muck (collectively, Brayman) seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (PennDot) from using a short-list process and a best-value assessment method of procurement in awarding constructing contracts. For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment is granted.
This matter involves the efforts of Penn-Dot to award a contract for the Interstate-90 Six-Mile Creek Bridge Replacement Project…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Brayman Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Marshall v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hanisco v. Township of WarminsterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Chesapeake Thermite Welding, LLC, d/b/a CTW v. DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Warwick Twp. v. J. and J. WintersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020