Legal Opinion

Brayman Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 2011No. 527 M.D. 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Before this Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Brayman Construction Corporation and Stephen M. Muck (collectively, Brayman) seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (PennDot) from using a short-list process and a best-value assessment method of procurement in awarding constructing contracts. For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment is granted.

This matter involves the efforts of Penn-Dot to award a contract for the Interstate-90 Six-Mile Creek Bridge Replacement Project…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Brayman Construction Corp. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Marshall v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanisco v. Township of WarminsterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Chesapeake Thermite Welding, LLC, d/b/a CTW v. DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Warwick Twp. v. J. and J. WintersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API