Legal Opinion
Marshall v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 1994No. 198 M.D. 1993PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.
On June 28, 1993, William Marshall (Marshall), pro se, filed a petition for review in our original jurisdiction in the nature of mandamus. 1 The facts, as alleged in Marshall’s petition, follow.
On April 8, 1992, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) conducted a parole interview of Marshall. Following said interview, Marshall was informed that his ^parole was refused and that the Board would not consider further parole applications submitted by Marshall unless and until he received a recommendation from the Department of Corrections. On April 10, 1992,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Giddings v. TartlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Pierce v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Campbell v. RosenbergerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Gillespie v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by21 opinions
- Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Mickens-Thomas v. Commonwealth, Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Leach v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Sanders v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Commonwealth, Treasury DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.