Legal Opinion

United States v. Pollard

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided August 10, 1988No. Misc. Docket No. 001-62-88PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON APPEAL OF THE GOVERNMENT FROM TRIAL JUDGE’S RULING SUPPRESSING EVIDENCE

PANEL ONE

BAUM, Chief Judge:

This is the Coast Guard’s second Government Appeal under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862. The first, United States v. Solorio, 21 M.J. 512 (C.G.C.M.R.1985), Aff’d 21 M.J. 251 (C.M.A.1986), Aff’d — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 2924, 97 L.Ed.2d 364 (1987), involved the jurisdictional question of “service connection” for court-martial offenses, a concept forsaken by the U.S. Supreme Court in its ultimate action on the case. This second challenge of a judge’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. SolorioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. JohnstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. VangelistiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. ReineckeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. VangelistiU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. MonfordU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API