Legal Opinion

Board of Health v. City of St. Bernard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1969No. Nos. 68-706 and 68-713PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Section 2323.05, Revised Code, in pertinent part, reads:

“An action may be dismissed without prejudice to a future action:
“(A) By the plaintiff, before its final submission to the jury, or to the court, when trial is by the court, * *

After the demurrer to relators’ petition was sustained by the Court of Appeals, and relators given the right to plead further, the statutory right of relators to dismiss without prejudice was absolute. Therefore, the Court of Appeals should have approved the entry of dismissal without prejudice which was tendered on November 13, 1968. -j

In McGatrick v. Wason, 4…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moherman v. NickelsOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State, Ex Rel. Mowrer v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gabriel v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Central Mutual Insurance v. Bradford-White Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Lewis v. Horace Mann InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  5. Harrison v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API