Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Mingo School District No. 16
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 20, 1977No. 48082PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOX, Judge.
An appeal by the City of Tulsa, plaintiff-condemnor in an eminent domain proceeding, from an order overruling City’s motion for a new trial, subsequent to the entry of judgment on a jury awarded verdict in the amount of $100,000 in favor of Mingo School District No. 16.
At issue is the proper measure of severance damages in the condemnation of a small strip of school district property upon which a functioning elementary school is located. The condemning authority, the City of Tulsa, urges that the usual “before and after” market value test is the only permissible measure of damages.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loretta Lynn Gomez v. Kanawha County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Lamar Central Outdoor, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- PERRY v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Perry v. Grand River Dam AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.